Supply Planning
Two plants are running hot and one is the relief valve. Can the network actually build the demand plan, and where does it break first?
Match demand to a feasible, labor-aware supply plan across the 8-site network — capacity, materials and production schedule reconciled concurrently.
Plan attainment
96.2%
+1.1%schedule adherence
Capacity utilization
84%
+2%network average
Line-item fill
97.4%
+0.6%target 98%
Capacity exceptions
3
0%2 high severity
Expedite events
11
-25%vs prior cycle
Capacity load heatmap ›
Projected line load vs available · plant × week (peak season)
● <75%● 75-92%● 92-100%● >100%
Drill in →| Plant | W30 | W31 | W32 | W33 | W34 | W35 | W36 | W37 | W38 | W39 | W40 | W41 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Forge | 92 | 96 | 99 | 102 | 103 | 103 | 101 | 99 | 95 | 91 | 88 | 84 |
| Ironvale | 98 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 96 | 93 | 89 | 85 | 81 | 79 | 77 | 76 |
| Saltmarsh Works | 67 | 67 | 68 | 70 | 74 | 77 | 81 | 85 | 88 | 90 | 91 | 90 |
| Kestrel Park | 113 | 114 | 114 | 112 | 109 | 106 | 102 | 98 | 94 | 92 | 90 | 90 |
| Maple Hollow | 65 | 63 | 61 | 60 | 61 | 63 | 66 | 69 | 73 | 77 | 80 | 83 |
| Copperline | 90 | 86 | 83 | 79 | 76 | 74 | 74 | 75 | 77 | 80 | 84 | 88 |
| Harlow Bend | 80 | 84 | 87 | 91 | 93 | 95 | 95 | 94 | 91 | 88 | 84 | 80 |
| Brightfield | 52 | 53 | 55 | 58 | 62 | 66 | 70 | 73 | 75 | 76 | 76 | 74 |
Supply–demand balance ›
000 units / month · plan horizon
Site utilization ›
Capacity load by plant
Cedar Forge91.0%
Ironvale88.0%
Saltmarsh Works79.0%
Kestrel Park94.0%
Maple Hollow72.0%
Copperline86.0%
Harlow Bend83.0%
Brightfield64.0%
Supply exceptions ›
Capacity & material imbalances
Assembly capacity overload - Cedar Forge Wk32-36
Shift 1,800 units to Harlow Bend + add weekend shift; pre-build 2 weeks ahead.
Brightfield ramp behind learning curve
Re-baseline ramp curve; add 1 supervisor + targeted training.
Recommended supply actions
AI-generated, scenario-tested