Capacity Load by Site
Two plants run hot (Kestrel Park 94%, Cedar Forge 91%) while Brightfield sits at 64% — the relief valve for rebalancing without overtime.
Hottest site
94%
Kestrel Park
Network utilization
84%
+2%2 sites > 90%
Relief capacity
64%
Brightfield
Capacity load by site
Projected line load vs available (peak season)
AI narrative
Why this matters
Kestrel Park (outdoor-equipment fab) and Cedar Forge (flagship assembly) are the binding constraints; Cedar Forge is projected to breach 100% in Wk32-36. Brightfield at 64% absorbs the overflow. Rebalancing ~1,800 units of Home Appliances to Harlow Bend resolves the peak overload without overtime and protects ~$4.8M of revenue.
Site load detail
Utilization, service and overtime by plant
| Site | Load % | Service | Overtime |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kestrel Park | 94% | 96.1% | 15.6% |
| Cedar Forge | 91% | 98.2% | 12.4% |
| Ironvale | 88% | 97.5% | 9.8% |
| Copperline | 86% | 97.2% | 11.8% |
| Harlow Bend | 83% | 97.8% | 8.4% |
| Saltmarsh Works | 79% | 96.9% | 7.1% |
| Maple Hollow | 72% | 98.4% | 5.2% |
| Brightfield | 64% | 95.8% | 6.1% |